From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 28 20:42:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCB716A4CE for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:42:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.server.rpi.edu (smtp2.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0210343D48 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:42:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp2.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6SKg6DP000864; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:42:08 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040728223439.783ab556@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <20040727233948.15640c99@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20040728184935.GA715@voodoo.laverenz.de> <20040728223439.783ab556@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:42:05 -0400 To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ruby18 fails as dependecy of sysutils/portupgrade with make: don't know how to make INSTALLS_DEPENDS X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:42:10 -0000 At 10:34 PM +0300 7/28/04, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 20:49:35 +0200 >Uwe Laverenz wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:39:48PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> > > > This happens on a 5.2.1-RELEASE with ports up-to-date, with > > > only perl, postfix and cvsup-without-gui installed. > > > > I guess this happens because you use -RELEASE and not RELENG_5_2. > > If you update the base system to 5.2.1-p9 you get some fixes that > > will satisfy the ruby port (probably the OpenSSL bug, see below *). > >I see. My plan was to update to -CURRENT and see how this little >Pentium 120MHz behaves, but since current's waters seems to be >very troubled right now I postponed that. Your plan is a very reasonable one. Note that RELENG_5_2 is an actual CVS tag, and it is *NOT* the same as 5.2-current. It is 5.2-RELEASE plus a very few security fixes. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu