From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 5 14:41:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C8D16A403 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (grnl-static-02-0046.dsl.iowatelecom.net [69.66.56.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E9013C455 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l05ES8sh048518; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:28:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l05ES8Oe048517; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:28:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:28:08 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: Peter Groer II Message-ID: <20070105142808.GA48496@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <000501c73083$40ef44a0$c2cdcde0$@com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000501c73083$40ef44a0$c2cdcde0$@com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any hopes for a BSD for the new Cell Chip? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:41:01 -0000 --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 11:37:38PM -0500, Peter Groer II wrote: > Any hopes for a BSD for the new Cell Chip from Sony/IBM/Toshiba ? The first step would be a PowerPC 64-bit port. Once that's done, my understanding is that the rest is easy, though supporting a traditional permission and execution model is impractical due to the vast amount of state that must be context switched. -- Brooks --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFnmB3XY6L6fI4GtQRAiZMAJ9WbNEudbcxwQDn6O+ntfniko9JIQCfe63c WOSja/VqU0docuZD7GTuL78= =NlRc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--