From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 7 1:37: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from paert.tse-online.de (paert.tse-online.de [194.97.69.172]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C407F15D9C for ; Fri, 7 May 1999 01:36:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ab@paert.tse-online.de) Received: (qmail 37860 invoked by uid 1000); 7 May 1999 08:35:15 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 10:35:14 +0200 From: Andreas Braukmann To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Amancio Hasty Subject: Re: just pulled the egcs-switch Message-ID: <19990507103514.B457@paert.tse-online.de> References: <19990507094730.A457@paert.tse-online.de> <199905070810.BAA26647@rah.star-gate.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: <199905070810.BAA26647@rah.star-gate.com>; from Amancio Hasty on Fri, May 07, 1999 at 01:10:31AM -0700 Organization: TSE TeleService GmbH Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Fri, May 07, 1999 at 01:10:31AM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: > Is not a good idea to use the default egcs as it is configured to compile > c++ programs which use threads and exceptions for instance Netscape's > Eletrical Fire (A Java VM/Compiler) does not work. do you suggest to use the egcs from the ports collection as the 'more-or-less' default compiler for the ports? I've used the beast for a few c++ applications (from ports and various other sources), which needed the more advanced c++-compiler than gcc 2.7.x. But then I have '2 different compilers' and '2 different set of libs', again, havn't I? -Andreas -- : Anti-Spam Petition: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ : : PGP-Key: http://www.tse-online.de/~ab/public-key : : Key fingerprint: 12 13 EF BC 22 DD F4 B6 3C 25 C9 06 DC D3 45 9B : To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message