Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 16:26:28 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: black@MR.Net (Ben Black) Cc: bill@thuvia.qstools.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: That !@#$%^& AMI motherboard Message-ID: <199607162326.QAA02494@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199607162252.RAA15927@galileo.mr.net> from "Ben Black" at Jul 16, 96 05:52:46 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> correct me if i'm wrong, but i recall that the P5 (not the P6) requires a > special version as the second CPU. some sort of additional silicon to let it > act as a slave to the normal CPU. perhaps a call to intel would be in order. > > Ben > black@mr.net > > > ps - thanks to everyone who responded to my chflags question. the security > uses of the command were most welcome. > > I'm *still* trying to find a pair of Pentia running at > > about 120-150 MHz, which will cooperate on my board. > > The board *which you should avoid* is an AMI Titan II. > > There's now a Titan III and I think that I know why... > > Part of the trouble is the AMI support people, who give > > different answers on different days. Intel Multiprocessing specification compliance requires a part with an APIC. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607162326.QAA02494>