From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 20 2:24:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DAE37B935 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 02:24:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA53740 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:24:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:24:49 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stale modules (Re: panic in the morning) Message-ID: <20000420112449.C51522@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20000419162806.A8502@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:15:55PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:15:55PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > > I cvsup'ed, built world and kernel. Hhmm, actually I see no reason why > > there should be a problem since everything should be done by make world. > > make world doesn't build a kernel. Making a kernel doesn't build > modules. This bit me again the other day when updating, as well - panic at > boot when loading a stale linux.ko. \begin{newbie question} So why aren't the modules built with the kernel instead of with the world? \end{newbie question} --Stijn -- FreeBSD: | When I was in school, I cheated on my metaphysics exam: I The power to serve | looked into the soul of the boy sitting next to me. -- www.freebsd.org | Woody Allen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message