From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 17 15:17:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C66016A4CE for ; Mon, 17 May 2004 15:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEF243D5C for ; Mon, 17 May 2004 15:17:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4HMH3lF068211; Mon, 17 May 2004 15:17:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4HMH3Vi068210; Mon, 17 May 2004 15:17:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 15:17:03 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Mark Kettenis Message-ID: <20040517221703.GB67833@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <200405171132.i4HBW0h5012696@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040517200417.GA67285@ns1.xcllnt.net> <200405172045.i4HKjd4k014106@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200405172045.i4HKjd4k014106@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: tech-toolchain@netbsd.org cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] *BSD kernel debugging X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 22:17:06 -0000 On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:45:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > I cannot prevent you from committing this, but if it doesn't address > the items mentioned above, it may not be used on FreeBSD. Unless I'm > being relieved of gdb duties of course :-) > > Let's see. My kvm stuff would still serve a purpose for older > releases. [still about FreeBSD] Yes, to certain extend. There's already a port for gdb6 in the ports collection and I presume it also works on FreeBSD 4.x. Nonetheless, I like having gdb work without local hacks, so from that perspective it's definitely valuable. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net