Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 20:15:11 +0200 (EET) From: mika ruohotie <bsdcur@shadows.aeon.net> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Partition naming [Was: Adding Hard Drives - Prepping] Message-ID: <199701111815.UAA09453@shadows.aeon.net> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970110203640.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> from J Wunsch at "Jan 10, 97 08:36:40 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As mika ruohotie wrote: > > the default hands me only partitions a e f g h, can i get more of those? > Partition `d' is also available. By now, there's only space for 8 > partitions, and extending this will probably cause even more brokeness > than the recent utmp.h changes. :( ugh, ok... i've never dared to use the d, coz i remember having some probs with that ages ago... like with version 1.0 i think... =) anyway, so i was doing the Right Thing(tm) when i started to slice it for more partitions around... > > assigned partition from the sd0s1 is e, then f g h and a is the last, is > > there some reason for this? first time i happened i was confused... > See the (updated) section 2.15 in the FAQ, it also explains the > historic naming conventions (in the last paragraph). aaah, thanx... i knew that... (ofcourse i've read the faq someday) :p > cheers, J"org mickey
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701111815.UAA09453>