From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 6 06:58:30 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA20713 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 06:58:30 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA20707 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 06:58:27 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id HAA01924; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 07:01:48 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA00411; Tue, 6 Jun 1995 06:58:39 -0700 Message-Id: <199506061358.GAA00411@corbin.Root.COM> To: Tom Samplonius cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What does this mean? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Jun 95 18:02:55 PDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Tue, 06 Jun 1995 06:58:38 -0700 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > What do these messages mean? > >Jun 5 12:09:32 haven /kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 315 >Jun 5 17:54:29 haven /kernel: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400 > > I'm running a system from 5-29 (which is basically 2.0.5A). It means that there are a large number of clone routes getting created rather quickly (due to lots of new TCP connections with a large number of sites) and that the kernel is adjusting the expiration of the clone routes to compensate. -DG