From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 13 02:04:04 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562CE16A41F;
	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:04:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED1B43D46;
	Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:04:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com)
Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0D2422B045414;
	Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:04:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k0D242Gm045413;
	Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:04:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien)
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:04:02 -0800
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To: soc-victor@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20060113020402.GA45246@dragon.NUXI.org>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, soc-victor@freebsd.org
References: <49402550601120436x1228e447o21e4bf13ecf12edc@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49402550601120436x1228e447o21e4bf13ecf12edc@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD Group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:04:04 -0000

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 02:36:27PM +0200, victor cruceru wrote:
> Hi All,
> Please find below.
> 
> > Message: 16
> > Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:44:03 -0700
> > From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
> > Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64
> 
> > > As a safe measure, we can build and install a special PIC archive,
> > > similar to libc_pic.a and libgcc_pic.a, and use it here.  This is
> > > all in an assumption that it's still unsafe to produce the libdisk.so.
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> >
> > One way or another, please fix it.  Why is bsnmp linking to libdisk
> > anyways?  It's an absolutely horrible library.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> Because it was my decision to use libdisk I have to answer to this question.
> First, only one bsnmp module is linking to this libdisk (a module for
> HOST-RESOURCES-MIB).
...
> I can try to replace the usage of libdisk with something else which
> will do the job of detecting the disks and the partitions in a running

How does one use 'snmp_hostres'?  The AMD64 world builds fine with this patch:

diff -u -u -0 -r1.2 Makefile
--- usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_hostres/Makefile       9 Jan 2006 13:01:26 -0000       1.2
+++ usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_hostres/Makefile       12 Jan 2006 23:20:48 -0000
@@ -72,2 +72,2 @@
-DPADD= ${LIBKVM} ${LIBDEVINFO} ${LIBM} ${LIBDISK} ${LIBMEMSTAT}
-LDADD= -lkvm -ldevinfo -lm -ldisk -lmemstat
+DPADD= ${LIBKVM} ${LIBDEVINFO} ${LIBM} ${LIBMEMSTAT}
+LDADD= -lkvm -ldevinfo -lm -lmemstat

So what would I do with 'snmp_hostres' to show me unresolved symbol errors?

Can we commit this patch for now, until things are figured out?

diff -u -u -0 -r1.9 Makefile
--- usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/Makefile    9 Jan 2006 12:34:07 -0000       1.9
+++ usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/Makefile    13 Jan 2006 02:00:31 -0000
@@ -10 +10 @@
-       snmp_hostres \
+       ${_snmp_hostres} \
@@ -17,0 +18,4 @@
+.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "amd64"
+_snmp_hostres=         snmp_hostres
+.endif
+

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?