From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Dec  5  5:22: 1 2000
From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  5 05:21:59 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from home.bsdclub.org (home.bsdclub.org [202.227.26.94])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3ED3E37B400; Tue,  5 Dec 2000 05:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sada@localhost) by home.bsdclub.org (8.9.3/3.7W)
	id WAA67060; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:21:24 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:21:24 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200012051321.WAA67060@home.bsdclub.org>
To: lioux@FreeBSD.org, roman@xpert.com
Cc: yoshiaki@kt.rim.or.jp, ports@FreeBSD.org, sada@bsdclub.org
Subject: RESTRICTED flag could be needed for ports/audio/lame
From: SADA Kenji <sada@bsdclub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.22] 1999-12/19(Sun)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

From CVS log of ports/audio/lame/Makefile:

> Code is now under GPL, remove the RESTRICTED flag.
>
> Submitted by:   Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com>

LAME ports' restriction was for mp3 patent sake,
not for code copyright.
Please see http://lame.sourceforge.net :

  "Personal and commercial use of compiled versions of LAME (or any other
  mp3 encoder) requires a patent license in some countries."

Are you completely sure it is safe ?

# My comment ``condition is not clear'' was not suitable, sorry.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message