From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 27 14:09:20 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF8616A407
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:09:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5917E43D70
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:09:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32])
	by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1GSa68-000Bym-C1
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:09:16 +0300
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:09:16 +0300
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <E1GSa68-000Bym-C1@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
Subject: 6.2-PRERELEASE/amd64 boot kernel.gz failes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:09:20 -0000

originally posted to amd64@freebsd.org:

Hi,
	While trying to figure out why boot/pxeboot failes on some
kernels/hosts, I think i've come up with one solid nogo,
if the kernel is gzipped it always fails.
	Can someone confirm this? or am i suffering from some
local problem?

	thanks,

		danny