From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Sep 27 21:05:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA16206
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 21:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA16145
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 21:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.7.6/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id EAA29897; Sat, 28 Sep 1996 04:04:39 GMT
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 13:04:39 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>,
        hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: libz.so.1.0 where are you?
In-Reply-To: <v02140b08ae7233f6f22e@[208.2.87.4]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960928130350.29786A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 27 Sep 1996, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:

> >> Is there some reason that the library was not brought into the -stable tree?
> >
> >None that I see, just a matter of testing and time.
> 
> IMHO, even untested, inclusion is better than NOT AVAILABLE.
> 

Wrong.