From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 16 15:20:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CFA16A4E4 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:20:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96D143D2F for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:20:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1GFKGGG037099 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:20:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1GFKGiU037098; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:20:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:20:16 GMT Message-Id: <200502161520.j1GFKGiU037098@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Konovalov Subject: Re: kern/77570: [PATCH] ipfw: Multiple rules may have the same number. X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:20:17 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/77570; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov To: "Wojciech A. Koszek" Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/77570: [PATCH] ipfw: Multiple rules may have the same number. Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:12:41 +0300 (MSK) > Hi Maxim, > > I thought it was some kind of a side effect in rule manipulation code, but > if some reasons push people to use this feature, feel free to close this PR > (and thanks for reaction). This is just my opinion. I'd suggest to discuss your patch in -net or -ipfw maillists and ask people what they think. -- Maxim Konovalov