From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 16 18:43:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E57CE2EF1 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB0E13DC for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v1GIgx0S043405 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:42:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id v1GIgw7L043402; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:42:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:42:58 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Dave Horsfall cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Question on upgrading ports after 9.3->10.3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:42:59 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:43:01 -0000 On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Me again :-) I finally got around to following the notes that David > Wolfskill kindly provided (thanks!) and apart from some oddity about > "httpd" requiring a missing "libdb-4.2.so.2" (which will get rebuilt > anyway), I'm a bit wary of this: > > 7. Back up any files in /usr/local that you wish to save [...] > 8. Manually check /usr/local [...] to make sure that they are really > empty. > > Errm, why? Is it going to clean out /usr/local from under my feet? If > so, then that's a bit rude... Because of disk space limitations, I've got > /usr/ports -> /usr/local/ports (/usr/local is a separate file system). > And then there's all my private stuff... I think it means "save any local > configuration files etc"; if so, it could be better phrased. Presumably, the idea is to start from a blank slate. No, portmaster does not delete those directories. > PS: For those who also have a Mac, do *not* futz around with symlinks in > this manner, as it confuses the hell out of macports... It can be a problem on FreeBSD also.