From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 11:17:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211D6106564A for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03308FC18 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:17:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA896D44C; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 11:17:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BC0D784491; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:17:02 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Christoph Mallon References: <7d6fde3d0812040324y3bf0901cy1f4a6d961362c314@mail.gmail.com> <20081205072229.GE18652@hoeg.nl> <7d6fde3d0812050034y43a70ce8i49fbba92f9c8943b@mail.gmail.com> <7d6fde3d0812050035u6e3ea930o9e093830a8608444@mail.gmail.com> <20081205084441.GA29312@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <7d6fde3d0812050050l57684eebkf14f252d78b68ec0@mail.gmail.com> <4938F036.4010600@gmx.de> <7d6fde3d0812050131p2e9ac761n1c76575d3a3f5792@mail.gmail.com> <4938FA39.50709@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:17:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4938FA39.50709@gmx.de> (Christoph Mallon's message of "Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:54:01 +0100") Message-ID: <86skp2hnwx.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Garrett Cooper , FreeBSD Hackers , Maksim Yevmenkin Subject: Re: RFC: small syscons and kbd patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:17:04 -0000 Christoph Mallon writes: > Don't try to argue about style(9). IMO it's horribly outdated, but > there are conservative forces, which would prefer to cling to K&R. At > least we got function prototypes! If there's something specific in style(9) you don't like, you are welcome to start a discussion about it, and we will consider the merits of your arguments; talking about "conservative forces that would prefer to cling to K&R" will get you nowhere. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no