From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 07:04:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8C616A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:04:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from CPE000103d44c07-CM000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (CPE000103d44c07-CM000f9f7ae88c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.193.222.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A572243D39 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:04:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from 172.16.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id 19F0929544F; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:04:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from 172.16.0.200 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mikej); by 172.16.0.1 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:04:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4460.172.16.0.200.1101798279.squirrel@172.16.0.200> In-Reply-To: <41AC1A0D.1020705@speakeasy.net> References: <4013.172.16.0.200.1101790160.squirrel@172.16.0.200> <41AC1A0D.1020705@speakeasy.net> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 02:04:39 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Ash" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-wettoast-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-wettoast-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: mikej@rogers.com cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No RAID for VT8237? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:04:45 -0000 Ash said: > Mike, > > I'm not sure what the status of RAID on a VT8237 is, but is it possible > the array(s) is(are) there and you are not noticing them? No, there is no ar. Just the individual disks. > Most of these lower end PATA/SATA "RAID" controllers are doing their > work in software. As such you will be able to see (not to mention mount, > modify, etc...) the physical RAID components in addition to the actual > array. Yes, i understand that. I have many other servers with supported ATA raid.