From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 8 21:41:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E24B16A404 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.94.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4688813C455 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 21:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca [131.104.96.170]) by mailhub.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l38Lex01015179; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:40:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (rmacklem@localhost) by muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca (8.11.7p3+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id l38Lf4m24844; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:41:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca: rmacklem owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:41:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem X-X-Sender: rmacklem@muncher To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20070407005705.GA63050@garage.freebsd.pl> Message-ID: References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <4616CC12.8040107@ruomad.net> <20070407005705.GA63050@garage.freebsd.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 131.104.94.205 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Bruno Damour , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:41:01 -0000 On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >>> - There is no support for ACLs and extended attributes. >>> >> Is this planned ? Does that means I cannot use it as a basis for a full-featured samba share ? > > It is planned, but it's not trivial. Does samba support NFSv4-style > ACLs? I don't know about samba, but my NFSv4 server can certainly use them. I'll add my congratulations and thanks for the good work, to the list. (Currently I know diddly about ZFS, but I'll try it someday.) Good luck with it, rick