From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug  5 15:18:15 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA08735
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 15:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA08729
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 15:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA05527; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 16:17:41 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 16:17:41 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199708052217.QAA05527@rocky.mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: "Daniel Sobral"<Daniel_Sobral@voga.com.br>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Fetchmail
In-Reply-To: <032564EA.006C9FB5.00@papagaio.voga.com.br>
References: <032564EA.006C9FB5.00@papagaio.voga.com.br>
X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I was wondering... Wouldn't fetchmail make a valuable addition to the bin
> distribution?

It's already a port, so it doesn't need to be a part of the base system,
espeically given that it has limited 'general' use.


Nate