From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 18 17:15: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C5637B412; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 17:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (root@spare0.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.114]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA20566; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:44:37 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20010918163352.F90244@fump.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:44:38 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Alexander Langer Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Cc: Robert Withrow Cc: Robert Withrow , Jordan Hubbard , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, glenngombert@zdnetonebox.com Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 18-Sep-2001 Alexander Langer wrote: > > The previous suggestion (have a generic XFree86 port) is a) hacky, but b) > > workable in the current package framework I suspect.. > > Yes, would be a nice workaround. > > I don't use packages, though :) I'm forced not to if I'm using a machine which needs X4.. Usually for a fresh install I use packages since it gets a working machine quicker :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message