Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:52:21 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: andr@dgap.mipt.ru Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "configured irq .. is not in bitmap of probed irqs 0" -- what does it mean? Message-ID: <20050122.145221.52964235.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050122205818.GA1411@nas.dgap.mipt.ru> References: <20050122205818.GA1411@nas.dgap.mipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20050122205818.GA1411@nas.dgap.mipt.ru>
"Andrew L. Neporada" <andr@dgap.mipt.ru> writes:
: sio2: configured irq 10 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
: sio3: configured irq 11 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
:
: The box in question has Vortex86-based ICOP-6047 3.5" mainboard with 4
: serial ports (http://www.icop.com.tw/products_detail.asp?ProductID=125).
: COM3 & COM4 are configured in BIOS to use irq 10 and 11 respectively.
Chances are you don't have things configured quite correctly in the
bios. The interrupts aren't asserting proplerly.
: Surprisingly, but it seems that both COM3 & COM4 ports work ok
: (getty works, there is no "silo overflow" errors).
That's likely because you are using 9600 baud. sio installs a timeout
to harvest characters, and that's what saves you.
: So, should I worry about this error?
Likely.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050122.145221.52964235.imp>