Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:55:21 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240686] security/nss: regressions tests require bash Message-ID: <bug-240686-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240686 Bug ID: 240686 Summary: security/nss: regressions tests require bash Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: gecko@FreeBSD.org Reporter: naddy@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(gecko@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: gecko@FreeBSD.org Created attachment 207626 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D207626&action= =3Dedit Run regression tests with bash Running security/nss's regression tests reveals a number of shell errors fr= om test scripts that use bash features like the built-in UID variable and more importantly arrays: [: -ne: unexpected operator ./ssl.sh: 1245: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") ./ectest.sh: 49: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting ")") Running the tests with bash instead shows stunningly different results. Before (sh): Passed: 3017 Failed: 0 Failed with core: 0 ASan failures: 0 Unknown status: 0 After (bash): Passed: 14469 Failed: 0 Failed with core: 0 ASan failures: 0 Unknown status: 48 TinderboxPrint:Unknown: 48 Patch attached. We could change the shebangs of all scripts to /usr/local/bin/bash, but there is no need for this; simply calling the top-level script with bash is enough. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-240686-21738>