Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 1 Jul 2016 14:36:29 +0200
From:      Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To:        Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org>
Cc:        Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: qmail maintainer looking for committer, added rc-scripts
Message-ID:  <20160701123629.GI79889@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <b762c0e4-59fb-2a95-adc7-6bac0df84a46@erdgeist.org>
References:  <57a240da-5d36-0eec-fffa-7617d86ee2c7@erdgeist.org> <20160625144502.GB64102@home.opsec.eu> <b762c0e4-59fb-2a95-adc7-6bac0df84a46@erdgeist.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi!

> > Done.
> 
> I noticed the port having several issues with portlint. If I start
> fixing them now, is there a way to release the port with identical ports
> version and patch level?

That depends on the changes. If the files ending up in the
stagedir are different, then the PORTREVISION++ rule applies.

> I would not want users bothering to install "new" versions that only
> differ in the port's Makefile.

Bending rules is frowned upon, but "wenn's der Wahrheitsfindung dient" 8-)

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         4 years to go !



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160701123629.GI79889>