From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Jul 16 15:45:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C595B9BDFF for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3252B149A for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2E040B9BDFD; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA7DB9BDFC for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from mx1.mailbox.org (mx1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.mailbox.org", Issuer "SwissSign Server Silver CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F3E1499 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFBEA4252E; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 17:45:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date:received; s= mail20150812; t=1468683912; bh=tmXKwmf79eBBfQjQZgbq2u7q+rSabJCGo dKDeNyhRJo=; b=ZZrxkoR1g3t9KnSUeKW5x47XPrqY++MaLGVdrPvLPpp+YXa0B mKSo0ybOJz+CTHZXiSGVoosPxrbNkSYecPnC3QpqXOI2/xWyVO5bfwnsSnLQq371 4WqhO7ykB1SNF4rVM6pTwKeI8PnXzGA14S1C39v1PlY0yCuhWimj61elabwKn/kQ UY5v+lIWb8Bg1/vdG/OPzuYoE9VQLidgWCy1KtU0bIg/dHeHmXBlnQ4+bJFdAKt6 PMXlWWej/7DS/JoRE/M2Zv/toojF6Rjmwd+8qq9w/MUHLxdtC6yzwT9ZL+7eXzNS GZmzIp5zwnkcfMhBdk1amnnhSlH5il3pYO7uQ== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by gerste.heinlein-support.de (gerste.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.173]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id muCf5jmrui1d; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 17:45:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 17:45:11 +0200 Message-ID: <86mvlh7fjs.wl-herbert@mailbox.org> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: David Wolfskill , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building "extra" kernels in stable/11...? In-Reply-To: <20160716134746.GN1261@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20160716134746.GN1261@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 15:45:23 -0000 David Wolfskill skrev: > > For the paast few years, up through stable/10, I've had a dedicated > "build machine" at home where I build the role-specific kernels for > a couple of "production" machines (they "only" at home, but my > spouse & I depend on them), and update the production machines by > (temporarily) mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj from the build machine > onto each production machine (via NFS), then performing (essentially) > make installkernel, make installworld, mergemaster (with the usual > additional steps). > > This has worked quite well, and has been nearly trouble-free. It's > described in rather more detail in > .) > > Now, the build machine itself runs a GENERIC kernel (and has minimal > ports installed); I told it to build the additional kernels by appending > the line: > > KERNCONF?=GENERIC ALBERT BATS > > to /etc/src.conf -- and that has been working (as above). > > > Today, as part of my gradual ramp-up toward getting readyto test > stable/11 on more than just the above build machine and my laptop, I > figured I'd start building those extra kernels (along with GENERIC) when > the build machine updated its stable/11. > > Accordingly, I appended > > KERNCONF?=GENERIC ALBERT BATS > > to /etc/src.conf -- but the only kernel even attempted was GENERIC. In > reviewing the typescript (as I do all builds within script(1)), there > was no indication that the kernel-building process had any awareness > that anything other than GENERIC was wanted. > > Have I managed to overlook something obvious (again)? 1. Are you sure that you don't have KERNCONF defined in /etc/make.conf? 2. Have you tried to set 'KERNCONF=GENERIC ALBERT BATS' instead? Well, I cannot reproduce this issue on my stable/11 machine. -- Herbert