From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 25 07:30:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA23697 for current-outgoing; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 07:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paloalto.access.hp.com (daemon@paloalto.access.hp.com [15.254.56.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA23689 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 07:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fakir.india.hp.com by paloalto.access.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA104333822; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 07:30:27 -0700 Received: from localhost by fakir.india.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA078165642; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 20:00:42 +0500 Message-Id: <199610251500.AA078165642@fakir.india.hp.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: High packet loss for the `ed' driver? Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 20:00:41 +0500 From: A JOSEPH KOSHY Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, This is behaviour that I'm seeing in the recent (1-3 months) -current code: `ping -f' to any machine on the local ethernet runs out of buffer space very rapidly on my FreeBSD-current machine (2-3 seconds). The machine is a P5-90 with an HP PC Lan+ ethernet card (using the `ed' driver). Ping -f to this machine also results in a rather heavy packet loss. This behaviour is new and has cropped up recently. If you are using an NE2k compatible card, have you by any chance seen similar packet losses? I'm wondering if its a generic `ed' problem or something that specific to the HP PC Lan code. Thanks, Koshy