From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Apr 20  5:11:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D176537B424
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 05:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: (qmail 72345 invoked by uid 1001); 20 Apr 2001 12:10:54 +0000 (GMT)
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: thttpd hack for sendfile and accept filters.
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Apr 2001 04:44:02 -0700"
References: <20010420044402.L1790@fw.wintelcom.net>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:10:54 +0200
Message-ID: <72342.987768654@verdi.nethelp.no>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Second, it looks like there's a few things in thttpd that could be
> optimized further.
...
> .) pre-forking, this would help with stalling on disk IO.

Since the author of thttpd makes a point of *not* using pre-forking (and
thttpd still being very fast), I'm not sure that pre-forking patches
would be accepted.

See http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message