From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 2 15:29:32 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F111065673; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:29:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0218FC14; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 15:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so3278879wyj.13 for ; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:29:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=cnEpH/KfOu9r43EJK4EInNq/l2WTb7Pc4d7V2ELon90=; b=ITsGmXVCH4z4mL31tpY2E+2+paBoFN9wsaDn+dJYNf1KgoZ0SzpabVX75LiNtnPXYY MPMs6U1tkD0YLfW7BkfMI6dMLuSsToXevIruZoZwDnyJX3LIr1TDd8z3AMinKhE8K+MW r9Z0iZI3GAMUj5vxmSC3PwO7cIU/rIIg7JwBo= Received: by 10.227.145.139 with SMTP id d11mr8735214wbv.60.1317567718142; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 08:01:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.208.16 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 08:01:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 11:01:27 -0400 Message-ID: To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd , delphij@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is TMPFS still highly experimental? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 15:29:32 -0000 > It's common practice to set the swap size equal to or more than the > physical RAM size, as well as assumed in many places-- how could you > have a crash dump otherwise? minidumps don't require swap => ram -- Eitan Adler