From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Nov 20 11:15:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0228437B4C5 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:15:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eAKJFRI73571; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:15:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: FreeBSD Filter Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removal of Disklabel In-Reply-To: Message from FreeBSD Filter of "Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:55:37 CST." <200011201855.MAA49667@KIWI-Computer.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:15:27 -0800 Message-ID: <73567.974747727@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Ok. Any suggestions on a naming scheme? I'm all for /dev/hd01a /dev/hd01b > etc. (arg-- linux again, I hang my head in shame) Well, I don't think you'll get anywhere by renaming the devices or changing the conventions we already have, you simply need to consolidate the fdisk/disklabel process. You can do that without going to a Linux naming format. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message