From owner-freebsd-current Fri Sep 6 10:18:00 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA14263 for current-outgoing; Fri, 6 Sep 1996 10:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA14245 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 1996 10:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA11386; Fri, 6 Sep 1996 10:11:11 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199609061711.KAA11386@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure To: michaelh@cet.co.jp Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 10:11:11 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, p.richards@elsevier.co.uk, rkw@dataplex.net, current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Michael Hancock" at Sep 6, 96 11:30:25 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > The old saw: how do you sanely implement revoloution? The US has a > > complete governmental overthrow every 4-8 years, and does so without > > blood running in the streets. All we are discussing here is a change > > in the rules of order -- we don't even want an overthrow. > > Does revolution mean the government must sign a contract accepting > responsibility for all potential damage for an unspecified period of time? Yes. It means subjecting themselves to charges of malfeasance of office, and or impeachment proceedings, followed by criminal charges. The point of an oath of office is to establish this accountability. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.