From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 18 18:43:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B7A1065674 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F9E8FC13 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1R5MKe-0007vU-4i>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:43:12 +0200 Received: from e178041066.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.41.66] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1R5MKe-0001kp-25>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4E763BBF.6060306@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:43:11 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110916 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= References: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4E738794.4050908@delphij.net> <86zki1afto.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86zki1afto.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.41.66 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: PAM modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:43:18 -0000 On 09/18/11 20:03, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Xin LI writes: >> LDAP? (We do currently have some work on LDAP integration but not >> sure if the community would be interested -- this would need an import >> of stripped down OpenLDAP) and modifies OpenSSH to support public key >> in LDAP directory. > I would vote for importing a *complete* OpenLDAP, unless there are good > reasons not to; "slim base" isn't, considering how useful LDAP is. > > DES If this is a real opportunity, +1 for that.