From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 16:32:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5915416A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:32:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [212.43.217.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA6543D49 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:32:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cc-147.int.t-online.fr (unknown [213.44.125.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4403FCF; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:32:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:32:46 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Xin LI Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040925162007.GA870@frontfree.net> References: <20040925162007.GA870@frontfree.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline cc: "Jack L. Stone" cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port Spamassassin-2.64---> 3.0.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:32:48 -0000 +-le 26/09/2004 00:20 +0800, Xin LI =E9crivait : | Hi, Mathieu, |=20 | On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:29:15PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: |> +-le 24/09/2004 12:37 -0500, Jack L. Stone ?crivait : |> | I was wondering when the p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port will be updated to = the |> | new release? |> | Spamassassin-2.64---> 3.0.0...?? |>=20 |> I've made a patch available at : |> |> it lacks SSL support for spamc/spamd, but I'll do that on Monday. |=20 | Wow, this is great! Thanks! |=20 | In addition, it seems that both SpamAssassin and OpenBSD-spamd is sharing | a script with name 'spamd.sh' in PREFIX/etc/rc.d. I think it might be | good if both changed their names into another scheme, for example: |=20 | spamd.sh (SpamAssassin) -> spamassassin-spamd.sh | spamd.sh (OpenBSD) -> pf-spamd.sh Yeah, I know, I'll talk with the maintaner of the other port and see what we can do. | What do you think about this issue? IIRC cyrus-imapd2 and postfix has | similar problem... Well, the problem is slightly different, in the fact that they both have a master daemon and both install a master(8) man page :-/ --=20 Mathieu Arnold