From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 16 17:49:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC7B37B401; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA9343F75; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:49:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.242]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7H0nuwO093367; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:49:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7H0nutV052270; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:49:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7H0nunh052269; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:49:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 17:49:56 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: deischen@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030817004956.GA52247@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030816161332.GA39823@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KSE/ia64: NULL thread pointer in _thr_sig_add() X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 00:49:58 -0000 On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 07:29:12PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:13:36AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > There's at least a problem with the mutex_d test, so I suspect that > > we still have some lingering issues. This does not look to be > > related to thread pointers. I don't know to what extend it will affect > > ACE. > > One question. When you call (the syscall) setcontext() from > _ia64_break_setcontext(), do you ignore the signal mask (uc.uc_sigmask)? Good point. I don't think so. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net