From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 25 09:49:44 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E361C1065675
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:49:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1DF8FC18;
	Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:49:43 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4889A1B8.9060900@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:49:44 +0200
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>
References: <op.ueqfl1xy0g54sc@localhost> <08GlBzRclM@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <08GlBzRclM@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: chukharev@mail.ru, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Mk/bsd.openssl.mk optimization
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:49:45 -0000

Dirk Meyer wrote:
> V.Chukharev schrieb:,
> 
>> So I looked through some Mk stuff, and tryed to optimize it. Since I do not
>> know any magic of bsd.*.mk, I did just a simple test. And with the below shown
>> patch the time is only 1500 s, while with the original version the time is more
>> than 15000 s. I guess the time depens very much on number of installed ports,
>> I have about 1300.
>>
>> The resulting INDEX* files are identical.
>>
>> I should confess I do not understand how my patch works. I expected to see a 
>> file /usr/ports/.openssl_installed or /tmp/index_something/.openssl_installed
>> or similar, but could not see it... But I hope this patch will inspire you 
>> to do something really working. 
> 
> This patch breaks the desired funtion.
> 
> To speedup index build you can add in in your /etc/make.conf
> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes
> or
> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes
> 
> The linker will pull in the latests version of libssl.so,
> So this check is necessary to detect an installed port version,
> and record the correct dependency.
> 
> The result can be cached only if no other ports or package is installed.
> So you are right that make index could be otimized,
> but it will take much more work.

Why can't you cache it in bsd.port.subdir.mk as I suggested?

Kris