From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 14 16:58:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 566E616A47E; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:58:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1788F16A416 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org [216.136.204.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F40B43D5E for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:58:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rdivacky@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kAEGwikA088720 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:58:44 GMT (envelope-from rdivacky@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from perforce@localhost) by repoman.freebsd.org (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) id kAEGwiD6088717 for perforce@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:58:44 GMT (envelope-from rdivacky@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:58:44 GMT Message-Id: <200611141658.kAEGwiD6088717@repoman.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repoman.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to rdivacky@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Roman Divacky To: Perforce Change Reviews Cc: Subject: PERFORCE change 109942 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:58:46 -0000 http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=109942 Change 109942 by rdivacky@rdivacky_witten on 2006/11/14 16:58:37 __WCLONE is valid option to waitpid too. Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/linuxolator/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c#33 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/linuxolator/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_misc.c#33 (text+ko) ==== @@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ * this is necessary because the test in kern_wait doesnt * work because we mess with the options here */ - if (args->options &~ (WUNTRACED|WNOHANG|WCONTINUED)) + if (args->options &~ (WUNTRACED|WNOHANG|WCONTINUED|__WCLONE)) return (EINVAL); options = (args->options & (WNOHANG | WUNTRACED));