From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 11 14:37:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8472416A4CE for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:37:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at (chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.137.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 029FC43D3F for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: (qmail 99614 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 14:37:45 -0000 Received: from matrix010.matrix.net (192.168.123.10) by ns.matrix.net with SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 14:37:45 -0000 From: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:37:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20041010160231.GA836@pooh.nagual.st> <200410110221.05289.4711@chello.at> <20041011102721.GB8806@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20041011102721.GB8806@nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410111637.44760.4711@chello.at> Subject: Re: route vmnet1 host server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:37:47 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 11 October 2004 12:27, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > The above information says it all, I guess. I was confused, because the > vmware3 ports speaks of no support for bridging. This must be some other > kind of bridging ;-) As you tell me, this is a normal story and I don't > expect to have difficulties with it. There was a thread some days ago on the questions and emulation mailing-list about vmware3 setup. > My next question is irrelevant too, I guess. If I give my vm-winbox a > 'normal' local IP there is no need for the freebsd machine to act as > gateway (away with it from rc.conf) and I also don't need ipnat. The > normal firewall rules will do. Yup, you don't need to set gateway_enable="YES" in your rc.conf same with ipnat, you don't need it. There is one important thing when you start vmware and set up your virtual machine: In the Ethernet Adapters configuration dialog select Connection Type: --> Custom Vmnet: --> /dev/vmnet1 - -- Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x3BCA53BE OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBapq409WjGjvKU74RAhQfAJ9JZ20tg77jyrugYIK0X6tMUHWx2wCeO0Xb sYoIXJW8wQNFwQZOvFDiAZA= =qwVi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----