From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 6 09:18:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA19116 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 09:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (ppp-206-170-5-41.rdcy01.pacbell.net [206.170.5.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA19098 for ; Tue, 6 May 1997 09:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shockwave.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA04340; Tue, 6 May 1997 09:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199705061618.JAA04340@precipice.shockwave.com> To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) cc: ports@freebsd.org, samath@slt.lk Subject: Re: popper no-package ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 May 1997 22:53:43 PDT." <199705060553.WAA10899@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 09:18:09 -0700 From: Paul Traina Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Subject: popper no-package ? I see that mail/popper/Makefile contains this line: === NO_PACKAGE= "Needs POP UID" === Is this still true? I don't see any pop id on hub, for instance. Yes. === >> ls -slg /usr/local/bin/popauth 58 -rws--x--x 1 root bin 58410 May 12 1996 /usr/local/bin/popauth* === That's insecure. Even if it really needs the UID, we can just make the check the existence of the uid and fall back to IS_INTERACTIVE if it doesn't exist. (Put the check in pkg/REQ and that will cover the package too.) OK? Satoshi