From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Sep  1 17:39:27 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3A57A15027; Wed,  1 Sep 1999 17:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
          by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id TAA19869; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 19:36:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from sji-ca42-115.ix.netcom.com(209.111.212.115) by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id rma019716; Wed Sep  1 19:35:12 1999
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id RAA83164; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 17:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, jseger@FreeBSD.org, hetzels@westbend.net
Subject: Re: ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.emacs.mk (Re: emacs-XX)
References: <19990822212722W.shige@shige.org> <02cf01bef0ea$a8aee400$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> <19990829030336Q.shige@shige.org> <19990902085658F.shige@sitc.toshiba.co.jp>
From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
Date: 01 Sep 1999 17:35:06 -0700
In-Reply-To: Shigeyuki Fukushima's message of "Thu, 02 Sep 1999 08:56:58 +0900"
Message-ID: <vqcvh9unoat.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Lines: 26
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * shige>    a.) ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.emacs.mk
 * shige>    b.) ${PORTSDIR}/editors/emacs.inc

 * If there is no objection, I adopt plan a.), and want to import NEW 
 * bsd.port.emacs.mk to ${PORTSDIR}/Mk, or to ask for asami-san to do so.

Why do people want it to be in ${PORTSDIR}/Mk?  If it's because they
think they can build a port outside of the ports tree by using

.include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.port.emacs.mk"

instead of

.include "${.CURDIR}/../../editors/emacs.inc"

let me note that you need to somehow get the definition of ${PORTDIR}
first, and it will thus not work unless you include it after
bsd.port.mk or at least bsd.port.pre.mk.

Including it after bsd.port.mk will of course open a whole new can of
worms (just think what will happen if you use one of the directory
names in PLIST_SUB).  That means it has to be with bsd.port.pre.mk.

Do people really want to do that?

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message