Date: 03 May 2000 00:33:18 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports projects Message-ID: <vqc8zxs9jgh.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Ben Smithurst's message of "Tue, 2 May 2000 23:09:57 %2B0100" References: <200005021212.FAA46737@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000502230957.C79359@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> * > http://bento.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/3-latest-logs/extras.html * * Is this correctly removing dependencies before checking for excess * files? I see a lot of ports supposedly leaving (e.g.) a full set of Tcl * manual pages behind, which I find a little hard to believe. :-) It certainly isn't. I screwed up the dependency removing logic when I was scrambling last night trying to fix the problem of 3*upgrade being removed (and rendering the chroot environments useless since it took /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1). I fixed it now (I hope). See tonight's run (in 4-stable, will be starting in a few minutes). Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqc8zxs9jgh.fsf>