From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 17 07:08:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA15103 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 07:08:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from spooky.rwwa.com (rwwa.com [198.115.177.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA15090 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 07:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spooky.rwwa.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA07549 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:07:38 -0500 Message-Id: <199601171507.KAA07549@spooky.rwwa.com> X-Authentication-Warning: spooky.rwwa.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5.3 12/28/94 To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another cool hack with FreeBSD... In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Jan 1996 06:04:17 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 17 Jan 1996 10:07:38 -0500 From: Robert Withrow Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > The reason I mention this is that I finally got my Internet provider to > set me up a static route with a second IP address gatewayed through it. I was wondering about load balancing several lines? For example, if I could load balance two POTS lines with 28.8 modems, I could have the bandwidth of single ISDN at a fraction of the cost. With four lines I could have bonded ISDN performance, again at a fraction of the cost. Does anyone do this. Can FreeBSD do this? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Withrow, Tel: +1 617 592 8935, Net: witr@rwwa.COM