From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Sep 23 17:59:40 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF0BE0A8E0 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 17:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A2A7E4EC for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 17:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 21so6885667iof.6 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:59:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7GdswyiZxVhd292XmfU27MJ6xbpbwsVyL6s0hdQl5YM=; b=NceM1SprEXi1pW0IgWWk3FyWvnRkv6lY8ohVzwwi7dQZzLtgUlUOksRq4PZ2mqffFI EyeHj4nquvdA6N+nZMlZBnMPh0ShBKaT+XvrYSe3WidpvZq8d0v30t9s2oG/1eXlkc4D So3MCgy2dJfexllqHMnTQHbPiCOBT1S1dmzPT/BVgd+KXwwoRCr5QjKC4nU+UMOZxPEJ 4U3VE9N5pIj6WGy5C0Zs3Ojcl9+UoFZrRW83MKpTEo6WiLakduQkQ6DPFCwoC66QBzaE 7D+qjdpsK1TSjm8YMubevvU+4FfATh5GmEAQ3tMU6w1EFF0TH+Ow5fi+Ccou6vkUwNG0 aqtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7GdswyiZxVhd292XmfU27MJ6xbpbwsVyL6s0hdQl5YM=; b=qFh1T9EQNy6q2ennXg7QarfdPUOXKtsR3pWwQ/eTESOVfWqaTTTwscpDpEH+z6oR+D ye4BEcu9acS7tayUIs0pq6LWwqUJHwW+ufoMS4iCiTUwRMseQVGMYf75eoB32atOQy68 5PUAZUoJrz6YXMYuqFmBqeQYun0pO2zl4I3AcWqr+qUcQfEulgVd7C6/u9L3qvehQGgt UfL8NC4G3XQe/mX5yjqXVdb5cwhIQEDTVgFNb3vtyAPQGtwCmruiXj+QCchNT+M2aJzq EJawc2mQ037EOMUsOst+ldLIkFf0zJcfJrFU4Gayg/jP8YyojfryxgRVt/aa/kvYxmFD hHlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUg8sr3g5pz5V71vvSGIBo3h48LTLynz3oQwXLmYe9kmJw00lyf4 LYeRYSZ0dnLNumc9NVjBQ+HTGcT6qzC9YA7plh0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QACSgS4Br7o0s9+z5UxFHY9wuwb33xXxx/ewz1TeGtG4VztyrHvbYc+LErddhMgbnLWLYh/26w4E5RoOuKxJI4= X-Received: by 10.107.183.213 with SMTP id h204mr4070307iof.61.1506189579093; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:59:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.145.141 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:59:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Adam Vande More Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:59:38 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 11.1-RELEASE kernel panics while importing ZFS pool To: Erwan Legrand Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 17:59:40 -0000 On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:43 AM, Erwan Legrand wrote: > Hi, > > I have made an attempt at upgrading from FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE to > 11.1-RELEASE. Unfortunately, the 11.1-RELEASE kernel panics with the > following error: > > panic: Solaris(panic): blkptr at 0xfffffe00033e5f80 has invalid CHECKSUM 0 > > The backtrace is as follows: > > kbd_backtrace+0x67 > vpanic+0x186 > panic+0x43 > vcmn_err+0xc2 > zfs_panic_recover+0x5a > zfs_blkptr_verify+0x8b > zio_read+0x2c > spa_load_verify_cb+0x14a > traverse_visitbp+0x1f8 > traverse_visitbp+0x400 > traverse_visitbp+0x400 > traverse_visitbp+0x400 > traverse_visitbp+0x400 > traverse_dnode+0xc7 > traverse_visitbp+0x753 > traverse_impl+0x22b > traverse_pool+0x16d > spa_load+0x1bce > > The root file system is part of this ZFS pool, which means I can't > even boot my system. Attempting to import the pool from the shell > prompt after booting from 11.1-RELEASE installation media also results > in a kernel panic. > > I have searched bugs.freebsd.org, but none of the currently registered > issues appear to match. (Or so it seems to me.) > > The 11.0-RELEASE kernel boots from this ZFS pool without trouble. > Thus, I have reverted to 11.0 for now. > > Obviously, I'd like to upgrade at some point. > > Any suggestion is welcome. > Did you try a scrub on 11.0 first? -- Adam