From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 19 18:42:32 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA08103
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 18:42:32 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA08092
          ; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 18:42:26 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA00872
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Wed, 19 Apr 1995 20:33:54 -0500
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA03885; 19 Apr 95 20:07:15 CDT (Wed)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id UAA03882; Wed, 19 Apr 1995 20:07:15 -0500
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199504200107.UAA03882@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: [DEVFS] thanks for the thoughts
To: julian@freefall.cdrom.com (Julian Elischer)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 20:07:13 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com
In-Reply-To: <199504192358.QAA03041@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Apr 19, 95 04:58:41 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 592       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> It looks as though the majority feeling is:
> 
> /devs/disks/sd0
> /devs/disks/rsd0
> .... using bruce's naming scheme

Sounds good, though I'd like to have a visible /devs/something/c0t0d0s0p0
interface as well. Having both views available is a good thing.

(I like the System V /dev/rdsk vs /dev/dsk business rather than putting it
 down a level. That's a minor point, though... it's probably best to just go
 whichever way is easier to implement)

> /devs/tapes/rst0
> /devs/tapes/nrst0

> /devs/ttys/00
  /dev/ttys/tt00
  /dev/ttys/cu00

You need nodes for both sides of the sio thing.