From owner-freebsd-install  Wed Sep 27 18:07:33 1995
Return-Path: owner-install
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA21560
          for install-outgoing; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 18:07:33 -0700
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA21541
          ; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 18:07:29 -0700
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA11549; Wed, 27 Sep 1995 18:01:26 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199509280101.SAA11549@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: "Installation" and "upgrade"
To: julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 18:01:25 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, chuckr@eng.umd.edu,
        richard@harlequin.co.uk, freebsd-install@freebsd.org,
        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199509280058.RAA13413@ref.tfs.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Sep 27, 95 05:58:12 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 450       
Sender: owner-install@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Remeber also that if one were upgrading from all the way back, the reserved
> > space for the bootblock has gotten larger.  8-(.
>
> I don't think so....

My mistake; I thought this had changed.  Maybe it's the disklabel itself
that changed?

I remember an incompatability when upgrading a 386BSD 0.1PK2...


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.