From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 4 20:44:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B92616A41A; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 20:44:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@samodelkin.net) Received: from neo.samodelkin.net (samodelkin.net [195.62.0.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A1013C4CE; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 20:44:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjoe@samodelkin.net) Received: by neo.samodelkin.net (Postfix, from userid 10117) id 949E417087; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:43:59 +0600 (NOVT) Received: from husky.fjoe.local (gw.nsib.ru [217.117.80.2]) by neo.samodelkin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144EF17082; Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:43:59 +0600 (NOVT) Message-ID: <4755BC3B.9040809@samodelkin.net> Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 02:44:43 +0600 From: Max Khon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071028) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev References: <200711232356.lANNu3mp040885@repoman.freebsd.org> <864pezer7f.fsf@ds4.des.no> <200712031657.34074.jhb@freebsd.org> <20071204172535.GB82261@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20071204172535.GB82261@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=0.16.4 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:59:32 +0000 Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin , cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, John Birrell , Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet/libalias alias_util.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:44:03 -0000 Ho! Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> John Birrell writes: >>>> Log: >>>> Fix strict alias warnings. >>> A much simpler solution (relative to the previous revision): >>> >>> @@ -131,10 +131,10 @@ >>> sum += oddbyte; >>> } >>> /* "Pseudo-header" data */ >>> - ptr = (u_short *) & (pip->ip_dst); >>> + ptr = (void *)&pip->ip_dst; >>> sum += *ptr++; >>> sum += *ptr; >>> - ptr = (u_short *) & (pip->ip_src); >>> + ptr = (void *)&pip->ip_src; >>> sum += *ptr++; >>> sum += *ptr; >>> sum += htons((u_short) ntcp); >> *ptr++ would choke since pointer arith on (void *) is undefined AFAIK. > > I've been under impression that ++ on void * whould simply increase it > by one. Nope. Read man 1 gcc about -Wpointer-arith /fjoe