From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Nov 19 13: 1:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2A637B479 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:01:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eAJL17I67757; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:01:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Roelof Osinga Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RC1 install size In-Reply-To: Message from Roelof Osinga of "Sun, 19 Nov 2000 21:57:30 +0100." <3A183EBA.DEA87DEE@eboa.com> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:01:07 -0800 Message-ID: <67753.974667667@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Erm, I guess the practice of providing details has fallen out of fashion or something since I still have NO IDEA what you are referring to. How is it incomplete? What is missing? I am looking at the image here, for example, and I see a full set of OS bits, a full XFree86 distribution, a full set of packages, etc. If you could be more specific about just how and where it is "incomplete", we might start getting somewhere. - Jordan > Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > > > I have no idea what you are trying to say here. > > Depends on the meaning of release candidate. Traditionally that > means a candidate for release. I.e. the product is out of beta > test and complete. If so then what I was trying to say is > that it is not. At least regarding completeness. If this is > indeed a release candidate then I should suspend release if > I were you. It's missing some details. > > Roelof > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > eboaź (ingenieursburo Office Automation) web. http://eboa.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message