From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 14:20:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35AA1065676; Tue, 27 May 2008 14:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5D78FC12; Tue, 27 May 2008 14:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4REDbEa051416; Tue, 27 May 2008 07:13:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from kargl@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m4REDbZ4051415; Tue, 27 May 2008 07:13:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kargl) From: "Steven G. Kargl" Message-Id: <200805271413.m4REDbZ4051415@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <483C155F.2070603@gmx.de> To: Matthias Andree Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 07:13:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124a (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/123879: databases/db41 fails during configure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 14:20:49 -0000 Matthias Andree wrote: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Steven G. Kargl schrieb: > > Matthias Andree wrote: > >> The patch is rejected, db41 is fine on all -STABLE and -RELEASE AFAICT. > >> > >> Insult as incentive? Won't work for me. > >> You just forfeited any chance of my looking at your issue. > >> > > > > Whatever. You already sent me two private emails that > > state you have no intention of fixing the port. > > > > The bug report should remain open. A maintainer (and > > I use this term very loosely), who is too lazy to maintain > > his port, is a poor excuse for suspending a bug report. > > Open Source communities don't work the "jump when I tell you" way. I never told you to jump. Your refusal as the maintainer to maintain your port is a poor excuse for suspending the bug report. If you don't have time or the initiative to maintain the port, then drop maintainership. I'll also note that I sent a patch that you rejected. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/