From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Sep  7 13:42:16 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6171A37B400; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 13:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nelly.internal.irrelevant.org (81-86-164-179.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.164.179])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 983AB43E6A; Sat,  7 Sep 2002 13:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from simond@irrelevant.org)
Received: from simond by nelly.internal.irrelevant.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1)
	id 17nmOd-000Psi-00; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:41:35 +0100
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 21:41:35 +0100
From: Simon Dick <simond@irrelevant.org>
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: New scsi_target code
Message-ID: <20020907204135.GB79822@irrelevant.org>
References: <35902.1031382322@critter.freebsd.dk> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209071133450.10332-100000@root.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209071133450.10332-100000@root.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 11:41:52AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209062344020.44951-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju
> > lian Elischer writes:
> > >
> > >
> > >On Sat, 7 Sep 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> IP-over-SCSI ?
> > >> 
> > >
> > >Well I've just been reading about SCSI over IP.... so
> > 
> > That's different.  IP-over-SCSI is a much wanted Myrinet-light over here.
> 
> I am not aware of a spec for IP-over-SCSI.  Wouldn't it have to use things
> like AEN to send data in the reverse direction?
> 
> Of course, the various transports like FC define IP layers but they are
> usually peers with the SCSI layer.
> 
> If people are talking about iSCSI, this driver could also support that
> given that the iSCSI HBA was hooked into the CAM SIM layer.

Try rfc 2143 :)

-- 
Simon Dick					simond@irrelevant.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message