From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jul  2  9:36: 2 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D4437B400
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  2 Jul 2002 09:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DAE43E2F
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  2 Jul 2002 09:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com)
Received: from localhost (eischen@localhost)
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.3/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g62GZsXO019261;
	Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:35:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 12:35:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>,
	FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: KSE status report 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020912391.95531-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10207021232230.15661-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Good idea.
> 
> Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and it
> had the same problem (or so they said).

Well, it certainly looks wrong to use TAILQ_REMOVE inside of
TAILQ_FOREACH, so either libc_r should be changed or queue.h
should be reverted.

Also, enabling the queue macro debugging will definitely break
libc_r too.

> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> 
> > In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207020054590.94626-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju
> > lian Elischer writes:
> > >The big problem at the moment is that something in the 
> > >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE
> > >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r.
> > >(a bit ironic really).
> > 
> > Is the new
> > 
> > 	(elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1;
> > 
> > in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old
> > bugs in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros.
> > 
> > Ian

-- 
Dan Eischen


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message