From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sun Feb 21 07:02:10 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E80954D40C; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 07:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Djx823F25z3q2n; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 07:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1613890930; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YpPXBB5u6r7RkHusX38on04m1b/JwUQifdSsKGT5rfc=; b=SfZ4t571L8FeW83fle3PHnrrkD5RNMpR5uBKbwVxgUbO5O57lnAuXraRB1grMabdol9x4O kTg+793wUF9AUyPqF2LZU6dqCtAojOJtaLffy4b55CR27usd7VuUBF7WP5zTt/Wu4abOVN PzEZOxAETPq1/pT83U3OlxYRMJMMR+ikAWWHwYQDdBzsboj0+d+WYRt5J9qzIb0Dr1ojdb DMDOzJo1IEPz1+lNV2KnoSdE6R4Fr/59hALvRoH/X6YNcRxG7OSHqjMuLJYITPwFZsnE31 drY0Uh40EVjE31R4loiHTtxI4/dQPkj0ns3xEjXGt4sFIkDqQEryg4fU09KjzA== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 642C31F961; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 07:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 07:02:10 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Romain Tarti?re Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r566124 - in head/irc: . catgirl Message-ID: <20210221070210.GA54@FreeBSD.org> References: <202102192353.11JNrMtX005757@repo.freebsd.org> <20210220061956.GB66080@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1613890930; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YpPXBB5u6r7RkHusX38on04m1b/JwUQifdSsKGT5rfc=; b=e3apStqiRmEA6juGKaTfFELzo8vB/08uxNccbqA5WNp2KpDaNMRVh/1T0bOK6QHu+xvIcT U5S6U7f6IWeh+Nyv9QUf9uiP3mWuWyUB3n6WidIg1rYX6XLEKdWLtt2rynZFr8CiR8XSiA UuWjDUKxVBMQQJy3Cpj2Wb3pjSyuGlCyFGQ4Iuxz0JOSzEFTuHeVQhESBLVgOIFe9eH7ss ZRJcbJBZXN7TDFQqvcL7M5KUuNaV7pg0NOff0RuYBlJdpG7CBVTLliZtJZ3OAci14ll+ox lhTfSaqvNelsCIoUPVvErBCx4bir0Qjyvyg+bWaMqQsX7IJp4E3k8dvUsYle6A== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1613890930; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Cm+HMbIRw/pIYSx/zSGH662cUquRYHOu/aD7RLp5eH3cYiRqAbPFoSM5tHlf09pvM1Dmrf nDMtExLTHeQ6hbt5s2PxEN118txXyQbKzQ0TMjgILIoET7tWltB8bZqivhBGG1OajPN1HE 5s1gXdo+YLqmDzbggPkVw2vFS0Zy/5q3RIYELUzRC5y/XNtkuOuMInj/4RDjXMRZXild1U MIkc3g+5A6CcpJESYFghQK0L/qdWDz7Rtiglj8MhZB7mZLsfnXy0fx897YazazkhkzG0vl oPXBL6/D7n1NcH/IDc6EO0jKA3tyzVHuvQfSbjegIyIE3tsQyTmGjG/pT1Zi7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 07:02:10 -0000 On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 12:54:21PM -1000, Romain Tarti?re wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 06:19:56AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > +.if ${SSL_DEFAULT} == base || ${SSL_DEFAULT} == openssl > > > +LIB_DEPENDS+= libtls.so:security/libretls > > > +.endif > > > > I don't think this is right, or even allowed. Can't the code be made > > portable across all SSL flavors? > > Hum... This program is developed targeting libressl which provide this > libretls library to ease-up development of TLS related things. > > The author extracting the libretls stuff from libressl so that it can be > used with openssl, and that was imported in the ports tree as > security/libretls. Ah, sorry, my bad, I've misread the port name as `security/libressl'. Never mind, it's fine. :) ./danfe