From owner-freebsd-isp Wed May 22 10:50:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA13505 for isp-outgoing; Wed, 22 May 1996 10:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etinc.com (etinc.com [204.141.244.98]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA13500 for ; Wed, 22 May 1996 10:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dialup-usr11.etinc.com (dialup-usr11.etinc.com [204.141.95.132]) by etinc.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA26660; Wed, 22 May 1996 13:54:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 13:54:19 -0400 Message-Id: <199605221754.NAA26660@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jeff Hupp From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) Subject: Re: 2.1R vs 050196SNAP Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Dennis shaped the electrons to the following form: >: >: Can anyone, in a nutshell please, give me a simple bullet list of the >: most compelling reasons (excluding obscure device support) to >: run the SNAP over 2.1R. >: > As an ISP you don't want to run a SNAP. But do go grab the -STABLE >code! This has made a world of diffrence in uptime, gets you BSDI 2.0 >compatablity, and a much improved Adaptec driver. Likely more, but that's >what was important to me. Is anyone running our product in -stable? Dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD and LINUX