From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Nov 22 1:47: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns.caldera.de (ns.caldera.de [212.34.180.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB12A37B416; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 01:46:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from hch@localhost) by ns.caldera.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) id fAM9kjn31938; Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:46:45 +0100 Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:46:45 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: John Baldwin , Steve Kargl , arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Julian Elischer Subject: Re: Kernel Thread scheduler Message-ID: <20011122104645.A31484@caldera.de> References: <20011121212416.A88350@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20011122012838.V13393@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011122012838.V13393@elvis.mu.org>; from bright@mu.org on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:28:38AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:28:38AM -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > Perhaps if 'proc' is put under _KERNEL. Since proc embeds a kse, ksegroup, > > and thread, it can't very easily be defined w/o including those definitions. > > #if defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_REALLY_WANT_PROC) What about _KMEMUSER? Christoph -- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message