Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:32:30 -0500 (EST)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpthread/thread thr_mutex.c
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.43.0411011730170.28562-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <xzpzn212oog.fsf@dwp.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:

> Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
> > We use error check mutexes by default, which is allowed by the
> > spec, because they come at no cost [...]
>
> They come at considerable cost.  They make it impossible to use the
> Boehm garbage collector in threaded programs, for instance, because
> pthread_mutex_init() calls malloc() which tries to use a mutex.  There
> is probably a significant performance penalty as well.

No, they all call malloc() since all mutexes are currently pointers
to thingies.

--=20
Dan Eischen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0411011730170.28562-100000>